Results ready on calculate
Configure both scenarios independently. The calculator will call the ExactTakeHome engine once for Scenario A and once for Scenario B, then show net pay, tax lines, pre-tax deductions, and the annual delta.
Minnesota scenario A prefill
Compare a Minnesota paycheck against another state, filing status, pay type, pay frequency, deduction plan, W-4 setup, or local-tax city.
Scenario A starts in Minnesota. Scenario B starts in Texas, but both panels are fully editable, so you can compare a raise, a new pay schedule, a move, or a second household member without forcing both sides to share state or filing-status assumptions.
Results ready on calculate
Configure both scenarios independently. The calculator will call the ExactTakeHome engine once for Scenario A and once for Scenario B, then show net pay, tax lines, pre-tax deductions, and the annual delta.
For a $103,750 salary, single filing status, no city selection, and no added W-4 adjustments, the Minnesota biweekly estimate keeps $75,578 annually after modeled federal, FICA, and state withholding. That is an effective withholding rate of 27.1%.
Switching the same Minnesota annual salary from biweekly to monthly does not create a new annual salary, but it changes cash-flow timing: the monthly net paycheck is $6,297 versus $2,907 biweekly. The annual net-pay difference between those two same-state timing examples is -$12.
Minnesota state withholding is $6,240 in the $100,000 single-filer example, which is why state choice can move the annual net-pay delta even when both scenarios use the same gross pay.
Example facts: MN minnesota salary-$103,750 net-$75,578 biweekly-$2,907 monthly-$6,297 state-$6,240 federal-$13,995 fica-$7,937 delta-TX--$6,240 compare-$81,818. Shorthand: minnesota salary-$103,750 net-$75,578 biweekly-$2,907 monthly-$6,297 state-$6,240 federal-$13,995 fica-$7,937 delta-TX--$6,240 compare-$81,818.
It compares two independent paycheck scenarios side by side: gross pay, pre-tax deductions, federal withholding, state withholding, supported local tax, FICA, and net pay. The two scenarios can use different states, filing statuses, pay types, pay frequencies, W-4 inputs, and deduction assumptions.
Annual net pay shows the true tax impact over the year. Per-paycheck net pay shows cash-flow timing, which can change when pay frequency changes even if the annual tax result is nearly the same.
Traditional 401(k), HSA, and other pre-tax deductions reduce taxable wages before withholding. W-4 Step 2, Step 3, Step 4(a), Step 4(b), and Step 4(c) can change federal withholding, so the delta can move even when gross pay is unchanged.
No. Results are estimates based on the ExactTakeHome engine, IRS Pub 15-T methodology, FICA rules, official state withholding tables, and modeled local tax data where available. Employer payroll settings and personal tax facts can produce a different result.